Satscribe

History

From detailed tx investigations to high-level block summaries. Dive into personal insights or browse the archive of the community. Discover how others interpret txs and blocks.

  • Transaction: 2a9daad0b3b516c9f8642b154c1bdc540a04abc03047ab0181d1bba108364a5d
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe

    • The transaction (TXID: 2a9daad0...) presents a unique output structure with five distinct outputs totaling 314,754,217 sats, indicating non-standard distribution likely aimed at multiple beneficiaries or testing functionality rather than a typical transaction layout.

    • The presence of three OP_RETURN outputs within this transaction signifies usage of on-chain data storage, perhaps for non-monetary data or messaging. This reflects an evolving trend in leveraging Bitcoin for more than just currency transfer.

    • The transaction is noteworthy for having a fee of 0 sats, suggesting it was either a test, part of a zero-fee promotional strategy, or conducted under specific conditions that negate typical fee structures.

    • Its classification includes v1_p2tr and v0_p2wsh types, yet it doesn't exhibit CoinJoin-like or consolidation behavior, which may indicate straightforward transaction intentions or unique privacy considerations despite the multiple outputs.

    2 months ago
    Mempool
  • Transaction: b76a6e56eac51ac59091a08001786b7d5f62e9b18b35dd09d61836e2f1f3929a
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe

    • Transaction Type: The transaction is categorized as P2WPKH (Pay-to-Witness-Public-Key-Hash) given the inferred wallet types. This suggests the use of SegWit for minor fee savings and increased block space efficiency.

    • Input/Output Patterns: It incorporates a single input and two outputs, indicating a typical payment scenario rather than complex batching or CoinJoin techniques; this is relatively straightforward and lacks consolidation or privacy behaviors.

    • Fee Analysis: The transaction fee of 5,640 satoshis is notable considering the total input of over 316 million satoshis, reflecting a low percentage fee relative to the transaction size, which might not classify it among high fee payers.

    • General Transaction Volume: The block itself contains 2,445 transactions, indicating a healthy level of activity; however, the individual transaction's relatively low fee does not suggest urgency or high priority in processing.

    2 months ago
    Mempool
  • Transaction: 085e7b52852047e59c5d68d3da55bca247bfae4c63216ee2164b63a32fd8fa8e
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe

    • The transaction utilizes predominantly legacy wallet types (5 v0 P2WPKH and 2 P2SH), indicating a potential user preference for compatibility over newer standards.

    • The input-to-output ratios suggest a typical transactional flow, yet the presence of 6 outputs for a single input signifies potential redistribution strategies or fund dispersion.

    • The transaction fee of 2,190 sats is relatively high given its modest size, pointing to a potential urgency in confirmation or an attempt to prioritize transaction speed.

    • No privacy techniques like CoinJoin or OP_RETURN outputs are present, reflecting a straightforward transaction without aggregation or obfuscation of funds.

    2 months ago
    Mempool
  • Block: 900000
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe
    • The current block (900001) has a total of 2,170 transactions, which is relatively high compared to the previous block (899999) with only 633 transactions. This indicates increased network activity.
    • The highest transaction fee in block 900001 (51,900 sats) is significantly larger than the previous block’s highest fee (25,374 sats), suggesting higher user demand for prompt confirmations.
    • The block size (1,543,737 bytes) is smaller than the previous block’s size (1,920,777 bytes), despite a greater transaction count, indicating more efficient use of space.
    • Mining was handled by AntPool for this block, marking a change from ViaBTC. This shift, alongside the block's high transaction volume and fees, suggests dynamic miner competition.
    2 months ago
    Mempool
  • Transaction: 0b7142de75cb59f316d8ac4cc673ad37dc4418789346e4c3cb1d995c509110f3
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe
    • The transaction type is a P2WPKH, as inferred from the presence of v0_p2wpkh and v1_p2tr wallet types, indicating standard Pay-to-Witness-Public-Key-Hash outputs.
    • It exhibits atypical input/output behavior, with two inputs totaling 1,227,567 sats and two outputs at 1,226,627 sats, signaling minimal profit-oriented transfers or potential consolidation of multiple UTXOs on the sender's side.
    • The transaction fee of 940 sats is relatively low considering its size, suggesting it does not prioritize high fee payment for faster confirmation, nor does it position as a top fee payer.
    • No CoinJoin-like or consolidation behaviors were detected, indicating standard transactional activity without privacy enhancements or merging of funds.
    2 months ago
    Mempool