Satscribe

History

From detailed tx investigations to high-level block summaries. Dive into personal insights or browse the archive of the community. Discover how others interpret txs and blocks.

  • Block: 706755
    What's unusual or interesting here?
    Scribe

    Interesting Insights from the Blockchain Data

    In analyzing the provided Bitcoin block data, a few key observations stand out:

    Transaction Activity

    • Volume of Transactions: Block 706755 featured 990 transactions, while the previous block had 1,658, indicating fluctuations in network activity.
    • High Fees: Notably, the top transaction from Block 706756 had a fee of 753,600 sats, significantly higher than the top fee in Block 706755, which was 207,100 sats. This suggests increased demand for transaction prioritization.

    Miner Contributions

    • Different miners yielded varied outcomes: AntPool mined Block 706755 with a value of 628,451,584 sats, while F2Pool mined Block 706756 slightly lower at 628,485,433 sats.

    Wallet Types

    • The distribution of wallet types shows a varied ecosystem. Block 706755 had 24 P2PKH transactions, while Block 706756 had 16, demonstrating a diverse use of different wallet types across blocks.

    Data-Carrying Transactions

    • All blocks included OP_RETURN transactions, which are used to store data on the blockchain. Block 706755 had 4 such transactions, and Block 706756 had 5, indicating a steady use of this feature.

    These insights reflect the dynamic nature of the blockchain and highlight trends in transaction volume, fees, and technology use.

    Feel free to ask more questions to deepen your understanding!

    2 months ago
  • Block: 80669
    How big is this block and how fast was it mined?
    Scribe

    Block Size and Mining Speed

    • Block Size: The block you referenced has a size of 474 bytes.
    • Mining Timestamp: It was mined at a timestamp of 1284876186.

    Speed of Mining

    To assess the speed at which this block was mined, compare its timestamp to the prior block's timestamp (1284874364). The difference is approximately 1822 seconds, or about 30.4 minutes.

    In summary, this block is 474 bytes in size and was mined in roughly 30.4 minutes after the previous block. If you have further questions about the mining process or other blocks, feel free to ask!

    2 months ago
  • Block: 896457
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe

    Understanding Bitcoin Blocks: Insights from Block 896457

    Imagine a huge library where each book contains records of transactions, much like how a Bitcoin block holds transaction information. Let’s dive into what makes block 896457 interesting, using relatable examples.

    Key Insights from Block 896457

    Transaction Volume and Size

    • Transactions: This block contains 1,272 transactions. Think of this as the number of letters sent in a day; it's a moderate flow, given that the previous block had 1,389 transactions.
    • Block Size: At 1,565,519 bytes, it's slightly smaller than its predecessor (1,741,576 bytes). Visualize it as two shoeboxes stacked side by side; this one is a bit less full, but still substantial!

    Fees to Note

    • The highest transaction fee recorded in this block was 50,550 satoshis. If you’ve ever used express mailing to get a letter delivered faster, higher fees work similarly in Bitcoin—they can speed up transaction confirmations.

    Miner Activity

    • This block was mined by an entity represented as H://D6BEF996-E13D-42C4-A9DA-DD0FF82881CE. While it’s not a well-known mining pool like the previous one (MARA Pool), each miner plays a crucial role in ensuring transactions are recorded properly in Bitcoin’s ledger.

    Uniqueness

    • Coinbase Value: The miner received 313,542,315 sats as block reward. Think of this as a bonus for getting the block ready, akin to a small business owner receiving payment for a completed project.
    • Anomalies: There’s an OP_RETURN indicator present, allowing for data storage within the transactions. This is like using the empty pages at the end of a book for notes—useful for added information!

    Historical Context

    • This block is part of a continued evolution in Bitcoin’s transaction processing, showcasing both the resilience and active participation from various miners. It reflects ongoing developments in the Bitcoin network, indicating a healthy amount of transaction activity.

    Conclusion

    2 months ago
  • Transaction: cb1a3a72a412787f90613396747a359b2bf757deb410626b9c2533d1c4b2b83c
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe

    Transaction Analysis of TXID cb1a3a72a412787f90613396747a359b2bf757deb410626b9c2533d1c4b2b83c

    Overview

    This transaction, confirmed within block #231074, presents several noteworthy characteristics that are instructive for understanding current transaction trends and behaviors on the Bitcoin blockchain.

    Transaction Characteristics

    • Type: The transaction is classified as a P2PKH (Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash) with a single input and output.
    • Inputs/Outputs: The transaction contains one input of 35,000,000 satoshis, matching an output of the same size, indicative of a straightforward transfer without any complexities like multi-signatures or additional scripts.
    • Fee: This transaction recorded a remarkably low fee of 0 satoshis, which is unusual as it signifies that the miner did not extract any transaction fees, reflecting either a promotional or testing scenario or potentially an inactive miner network.

    Insights

    • No OP_RETURN or MultiSig: The absence of OP_RETURN indicates that there is no additional metadata or data embedding within this transaction, hinting at a purely financial transaction rather than one that aims to store information on-chain. The lack of MultiSig further emphasizes simplicity.

    • Input/Output Patterns: Given that there is only one input and output, this transaction does not exhibit behavior typically associated with either high-volume CoinJoin transactions or consolidation, which would involve multiple inputs or outputs to optimize the UTXO set. This singular structure suggests that the send operation is directed towards a known address rather than an anonymous or advanced privacy-enhanced transaction.

    2 months ago
  • Block: 421248
    Which pool mined this block?
    Scribe

    Mined Block Information

    The block in question, at height 421248, was mined by Solo CKPool. This pool is known for allowing individual miners to contribute their hashing power towards solving blocks while collectively enjoying the benefits of pool mining.

    Key Details

    • Miner: Solo CKPool
    • Timestamp: 1468827526
    • Total Transactions: 1290
    • Coinbase Value: 1,278,281,672 sats

    If you have any more questions regarding Bitcoin mining or any specific concepts, feel free to ask!

    2 months ago