Satscribe

History

From detailed tx investigations to high-level block summaries. Dive into personal insights or browse the archive of the community. Discover how others interpret txs and blocks.

  • Block: 639769
    What is the reward earned by the miner?
    Scribe

    Miner Reward Details

    The reward earned by the miner in block height 639769 was 668,221,643 satoshis. This figure represents the coinbase value for that block, which the miner, Poolin, receives as compensation for their mining efforts.

    Key Points:

    • Block Height: 639769
    • Miner: Poolin
    • Coinbase Value: 668,221,643 satoshis

    This amount includes both the block subsidy and transaction fees from the block's transactions.

    If you have any further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask!

    2 months ago
  • Block: 639769
    What is the educational value of this?
    Scribe

    Educational Value of the Block Data

    The data from the recent blocks offers significant educational insights into Bitcoin's operational mechanics and network behavior:

    Understanding Transaction Dynamics

    • Transaction Volume: The total number of transactions per block varies, providing insights into network load.
    • Fees Structure: Analyzing top transactions by fees highlights user behavior regarding transaction prioritization during congestion.

    Coinbase Transactions

    • Coinbase Value: The value in satoshis is critical for understanding miner incentives and block rewards.
    • OP_RETURN Usage: The presence of OP_RETURN outputs illustrates how miners and users utilize the blockchain for data storage or unique marker functionalities.

    Wallet Types

    • The decomposition of wallet types (P2PKH, P2SH, etc.) helps in understanding user adoption patterns and can inform development around wallet technologies.

    Blockchain Metrics

    • Block Size and Weight: Monitoring size and weight metrics reveals how efficiently data is packed and how it impacts overall network performance.

    By studying these elements, developers can deepen their understanding of Bitcoin's architecture, user behavior, and transaction optimization strategies. This knowledge lays the groundwork for improving applications, enhancing transaction processing, and auditing network performance effectively.

    2 months ago
  • Transaction: c61d014e706611950ef516ec16c3749cf8c22b2d5be09d444a2132f737532476
    Explícamelo como si tuviera 5 años
    Scribe

    Entendiendo Bitcoin Como un Juego

    Imagina que Bitcoin es un juego de monedas mágicas. Estas monedas viajan de un lugar a otro, y en cada movimiento, las personas juegan con ellas de una manera especial.

    Los Personajes del Juego

    • Los Jugadores: Son las personas que tienen monedas mágicas. Cada jugador tiene un baile especial para mover su dinero.
    • Los Mineros: Son jugadores especiales que crean nuevos caminos por donde pueden pasar las monedas. Ellos ayudan a que el juego funcione.

    Cómo Funciona el Juego

    1. Moviendo Monedas: Cuando un jugador quiere darle monedas mágicas a otro, hace un movimiento. En nuestro caso, un jugador hizo un movimiento que usó 10002912 monedas y recibió 10000854 de vuelta.

    2. Pagando al Minero: A veces, el jugador necesita darle un pequeño regalo al minero para que ayude a hacer el movimiento. Este regalo fue 2058 monedas mágicas en este caso.

    3. Guardando Todo: Cada vez que un movimiento ocurre, se guarda en un libro de cuentas grande, que llamamos blockchain. Este libro muestra todos los movimientos y asegura que cada jugador sepa de dónde vienen y hacia dónde van las monedas.

    Así, todos pueden jugar el juego de las monedas mágicas de manera segura y divertida. Es un mundo lleno de alegría y movimiento, donde cada jugador tiene su papel importante. ¡Y lo mejor de todo es que puedes seguir aprendiendo y jugando!

    2 months ago
  • Transaction: c61d014e706611950ef516ec16c3749cf8c22b2d5be09d444a2132f737532476
    Is this a CoinJoin or a batch transaction?
    Scribe

    Transaction Classification

    Based on the provided transaction data, this transaction appears to be a batch transaction rather than a CoinJoin.

    Key Indicators:

    • Inputs: The transaction has 11 inputs, which typically suggests consolidation of funds from multiple sources, characteristic of batch processing.
    • Outputs: It has a single output, indicative of a transaction gathering funds for a future operation.
    • Behavior Flags: The behavior flags specify that it is not CoinJoin-like and is likely designed for consolidation.

    In summary, the structure and behavior of this transaction align more closely with batch processing rather than a CoinJoin scheme. If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!

    2 months ago
  • Transaction: c61d014e706611950ef516ec16c3749cf8c22b2d5be09d444a2132f737532476
    Scribe

    Transaction Analysis Overview

    Transaction ID: c61d014e706611950ef516ec16c3749cf8c22b2d5be09d444a2132f737532476
    Block Height: 895680
    Fee: 2058 sats

    Key Insights

    • Transaction Type and Structure:

      • This transaction uses an uncommon approach with 11 inputs and 1 output, indicating a likely consolidation of funds from multiple addresses. The dominant wallet type is v1_p2tr for inputs, with a p2pkh output, illustrating a blend of transaction types that is particularly efficient for consolidating UTXOs.
    • Input/Output Patterns:

      • The presence of multiple inputs typically suggests either a batch transaction or consolidation of previous transactions into a single output. This architecture may be driven by the sender’s intent to minimize future transaction fees by reducing the number of UTXOs in their wallet.
      • The ratio of inputs to outputs (11:1) is unusual, showing an aggressive consolidation strategy that is often employed to manage wallet efficiency.
    • Fee Analysis:

      • The transaction fee of 2058 sats might appear low given the extensive input count, revealing a favorable fee per input, which is an interesting advantage given the transaction's size and complexity.
      • It does not rank among the top fee payers, indicating a moderate urgency in the transaction but perhaps an intent to keep costs low.
    2 months ago