Bitcoin Block Summary

Block Height: 545929
Timestamp: 2018-10-14 22:19:14 (UTC)
Miner: BTC.com Pool
Total Transactions: 78
Block Size: 28,802 bytes
Block Weight: 95,672 units

CoinBase and Transactions

• Coinbase Value: 1,250,337,495 sats
• OP_RETURN in Coinbase: Yes

Top Transactions by Fee

1. Tx ID: a4c119... (Fee: 120,000 sats)
2. Tx ID: a6d313... (Fee: 16,920 sats)
3. Tx ID: d4cd12... (Fee: 15,535 sats)

Wallet Types Breakdown

• OP_RETURN: 1 (Data-carrying transactions)
• P2PKH: 34 (Legacy)
• P2SH: 34 (Script)
• UNKNOWN: 1
• V0_P2WPKH: 2

This summary provides a snapshot of a specific Bitcoin block, highlighting key details about transactions and fees.

Coinbase Message Overview

The coinbase message serves as a unique identifier or statement embedded within the coinbase transaction of a Bitcoin block. It typically conveys information about the miner or the mining pool responsible for the block creation.

Example from Recent Block

• Block Height: 895498
• Miner: AntPool
• Coinbase Message: Mined by AntPool )qmmr15K'gFXHHu)yG+

Significance

The coinbase message can contain metadata regarding the block’s creation, contributing to transparency and acknowledgment of miner contributions. In this instance, AntPool includes both a recognition of its involvement and an alphanumeric string likely serving as a unique mark or identifier related to this specific mining operation.

This flexibility allows miners to express messages or include data, which can sometimes be a commentary on events or trends relevant to the Bitcoin community.

In conclusion, the coinbase message encapsulates information and personalizes the mining effort behind each block.

Analyzed Insights from Block 895497

Overview of Block Characteristics

• Height: 895497
• Timestamp: 1746522025 (significantly later than the previous block)
• Miner: Foundry USA (notable as a high-profile mining entity)
• Total Transactions: 2099 (an unusually high count compared to the previous block, which had only 1486)
• Size: 1613240 bytes (also significantly larger than the previous block at 1149767 bytes)
• Weight: 3306008 units (again markedly higher than the previous block weight)

Notable Observations

1. High Transaction Volume: The jump from 1486 to 2099 transactions indicates a substantial increase in network activity. This could suggest market movements or heightened usage of Bitcoin for transfers.

2. Increased Block Size: The block's size of 1613240 bytes points to increased usage of transaction types that require more data, possibly due to more complex scripts such as smart contracts or data-carrying OP_RETURN transactions.

3. Top Fees: The block features high fees for its top three transactions:

   • Transaction de50172be8e58d44b847081802a3b9d87fb763bafd2db29030719d28fee598b5 charged a fee of 60,000 sats, indicating it may have been prioritized for confirmation.
   • The next transactions had fees of 32,000 sats each, suggesting network conditions that warranted higher fees for quicker confirmations.

Transaction Analysis

The transaction with the ID c55d5265679dfde1851182f584617d207ab2a8b76f42aa20cde35f2c28a8711c displays several characteristics that may indicate its connection to certain wallet behaviors:

• Inputs/Outputs: It has 61 inputs and a single output, suggesting that this may be a consolidation transaction rather than a typical payment.
• Total Input/Output Values: The input value is slightly higher than the output, indicating potential fees or movement of funds to a single address.
• OP_RETURN and MultiSig: The absence of an OP_RETURN field and MultiSig output further implies it might not be linked to known services or specific platforms like exchanges.

Conclusion

This transaction does not exhibit characteristics that tie it to a widely recognized address or service, particularly due to its consolidation-like behavior and lack of identifiers common in typical transactions. If you require more detailed information about possible known addresses, deeper analysis or additional context may be needed.

Transaction UTXO Consolidation Analysis

Yes, this transaction does consolidate UTXOs. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

• Inputs and Outputs: The transaction has 61 inputs and 1 output. This structure typically indicates that multiple smaller UTXOs are being gathered into a single larger output, which is characteristic of consolidation.

• Value Movement: The total input of 8,584,540 sats is only slightly higher than the total output of 8,575,474 sats. The difference largely accounts for the fee of 9,066 sats, reinforcing the likelihood of UTXO consolidation.

In summary, the input-output configuration, alongside the fee structure, strongly suggests a consolidation of UTXOs.