Comparison of Block 773613 with Previous Block 773612

Key Differences

• Coinbase Value:

  • Block 773613: 630,419,355 sats
  • Block 773612: 0 sats

• Total Transactions:

  • Block 773613: 1,436 transactions
  • Block 773612: 2,600 transactions

• Block Size:

  • Block 773613: 767,401 bytes
  • Block 773612: 1,560,104 bytes

• Weight:

  • Block 773613: 1,929,403 units
  • Block 773612: 3,998,156 units

Notable Features

• OP_RETURN in Coinbase:
  • Present in Block 773613 (Yes), absent in Block 773612 (No).

This summary highlights the significant changes between the two blocks, especially in their economic activity and transaction volume. If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!

Comparison of Block 773613 with Previous Block 773612

When comparing Block 773613 to the previous Block 773612, several key differences stand out:

General Overview

• Height: Block 773613 is the next block after 773612.
• Timestamp: Block 773613 was mined at 1674687977, which is later than 773612 at 1674687628.

Transactions and Size

• Total Transactions:
  • Block 773613 has 1,436 transactions, which is significantly lower than the 2,600 transactions in Block 773612.
• Size:
  • Block 773613 is smaller at 767,401 bytes compared to 1,560,104 bytes in Block 773612.

Coinbase Value

• Coinbase Value:
  • Block 773613 has a notable coinbase value of 630,419,355 sats, while Block 773612 had no coinbase value.

Weight and Fees

• Weight:
  • Block 773613 weighs 1,929,403 units, which is less than Block 773612's 3,998,156 units.

OP_RETURN

• OP_RETURN in Coinbase:
  • Block 773613 contains OP_RETURN data, while Block 773612 does not.

In summary, Block 773613 features a substantial coinbase value despite having fewer transactions and less weight than Block 773612. Each block has unique characteristics that contribute to the blockchain's overall dynamics.

Feel free to ask more if you'd like to dive deeper into any specific aspect!

Was the Block Filled to Capacity?

The block at height 773613 had the following characteristics:

• Size: 767,401 bytes
• Weight: 1,929,403 units
• Total Transactions: 1,436

Conclusion

Considering that the Bitcoin block size limit is approximately 1 MB (1,000,000 bytes) and the weight limit is 4 million weight units, this block was not filled to capacity. It utilized only about 76.7% of its size limit.

If you have more questions about Bitcoin or blockchain, feel free to ask!

Bitcoin's Genesis Block: The Dawn of a New Era in Digital Currency

• Date of Creation: January 3, 2009
• Mining Reward: 50 BTC (500,000,000 sats) commemorating a pivotal moment in economic history.

Key Highlights:

• Block Height: 0
• Total Transactions: 1
• Block Size: 285 bytes

This block marks the beginning of Bitcoin, initiating a revolutionary phase in decentralized finance and signaling a significant shift in monetary systems.

Support for Soft Forks in Block 5

Based on the information from Block 5, there are no indicators of support for any soft forks. Key observations include:

• OP_RETURN Presence: The coinbase transaction does not include an OP_RETURN output, which is often a signal for soft fork implementation.
• Transaction Type: The wallet type is P2PK (Pay-to-Public-Key), lacking features that typically accompany soft fork enhancements.

In summary, Block 5 does not exhibit any characteristics that signal support for soft forks.