Satscribe

History

From detailed tx investigations to high-level block summaries. Dive into personal insights or browse the archive of the community. Discover how others interpret txs and blocks.

  • Block: 767193
    Write a short, simple summary.
    Scribe

    Short Summary of Block 767193

    • Block Height: 767193
    • Timestamp: 1670924037
    • Miner: Binance Pool
    • Coinbase Value: 625,516,768 sats
    • Total Transactions: 113
    • Block Size: 48,086 bytes

    Key Transaction Fees

    • The highest fee transaction: 160,000 sats
    • Additional notable fees: 78,750 sats and 40,497 sats

    Wallet Types Used

    • P2PKH (Legacy): 46 transactions
    • P2SH (Script): 31 transactions
    • V0_P2WPKH: 35 transactions
    • V0_P2WSH: 6 transactions
    • OP_RETURN: 2 data-carrying transactions

    This block showcases a balanced range of transaction types and notable fees, highlighting the ongoing activity within the Bitcoin network.

    4 months ago
  • Block: 528112
    How many transactions are inside?
    Scribe

    Total Transactions in Block 528112

    In block 528112, there are a total of 2,682 transactions. This indicates a busy period in the blockchain, showcasing high activity among users.

    Feel free to ask if you have more questions about Bitcoin or blockchain technology!

    4 months ago
  • Block: 834555
    How many transactions are inside?
    Scribe

    Total Transactions in the Block

    The current block (Height: 834555) contains 2659 transactions.

    This number reflects the total activities recorded in this particular block of the blockchain, showcasing how many peer-to-peer exchanges and operations occurred within that time frame. If you have any further questions about Bitcoin or transactions, feel free to ask!

    4 months ago
  • Block: 75960
    What's unusual or interesting here?
    Scribe

    Unusual or Interesting Observations

    Block 75960 Insights

    • Coinbase Value: The block features a high coinbase value of 5,000,000,000 sats, indicating a significant reward for the miner. This is unusual compared to the typical reward structure since this block likely reflects the creation of a new miner's genesis block or a large fundraising event.

    • Transaction Count and Fees: There is only one transaction, and it has a zero-fee status. This contrasts with most blocks that usually contain multiple transactions with varying fees, raising questions about usage patterns or miner incentives during this period.

    • Wallet Type Usage: The presence of 1 P2PK wallet suggests a reliance on full public key transactions, which could highlight a particular transaction type or strategy preferred during this block height.

    Comparison with Adjacent Blocks

    • The previous block (75959) shows a zero coinbase value and the following block (75961) also has no coinbase payout. This stark change from block 75959 to 75960 provides a noteworthy anomaly in the overall reward distribution.

    General Trends

    • Blocks at this timestamp show varying sizes and weights, which may indicate fluctuating network activity or miner efficiency at different times.

    These factors collectively illustrate an intriguing snapshot of block height 75960, especially regarding its large coinbase reward amidst an otherwise zero-fee transaction environment.

    4 months ago
  • Block: 293112
    Scribe

    Insights from Block Height 293112

    Block Overview:

    • Height: 293112
    • Timestamp: 1396115780
    • Miner: XYR!@PF
    • Total Transactions: 34
    • Size: 17,096 bytes
    • Weight: 68,384 units

    Key Observations

    • Low Transaction Count: The block contains only 34 transactions, a notably low count compared to its predecessor, which had 435 transactions. This reduction could indicate lower user activity or a consolidation of transactions, potentially due to network congestion or a temporary lull in usage patterns.

    • Transaction Fees: The total fees from the top transactions show two transactions charging 50,000 sats each, which is significant considering the relatively low overall transaction count. This suggests that the transactions might have been prioritized in a congested network, possibly leading to unusually high fees for typical transfers.

    • Block Size and Weight: The block size of 17,096 bytes and weight of 68,384 units indicate a more efficient packaging of transactions compared to the previous block, which had a much larger size of 237,377 bytes and weight. This efficiency might result from fewer but larger transactions or aggregate inputs within these transactions.

    Miner Analysis

    • Miner XYR!@PF: The block's miner is notable due to consistent activity, suggesting a stable mining operation. The miner's identity might be relevant for understanding any mining pool strategies or preferences in block assembly.

    Historical Context

    • Comparison with Adjacent Blocks:
      • Previous Block (293111): Featured 435 transactions, indicating a higher throughput and lower mining fees.
    4 months ago