Satscribe

History

From detailed tx investigations to high-level block summaries. Dive into personal insights or browse the archive of the community. Discover how others interpret txs and blocks.

  • Block: 456675
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe
    • Miner Change: The current block (height 456676) was successfully mined without an associated miner, contrasting with the previous block mined by CKPool. This brings curiosity to the operational status or strategy of miners active at this height.

    • Transaction Count: While the previous block had 2,904 transactions, this block had a notable decrease to 2,644 transactions, which could reflect lower network activity or higher fees pushing users to delay transactions.

    • OP_RETURN Presence: The inclusion of an OP_RETURN output in the coinbase suggests the utilization of this block for data-carrying transactions, which might indicate a trend towards using Bitcoin blocks for more than just value transfer.

    • Fee Structure: The block features high fees aggregated from several transactions, with the leading fee reaching 900,000 sats. This is significant compared to the relatively lower top fees in adjacent blocks, indicating increased demand for block space at this time.

    5 months ago
  • Block: 0
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe
    • The block at height 1 shows an anomaly with no miner identified, contrasting sharply with the previous block that featured a notable miner reference tied to a historical statement. This may indicate a change in mining pools or initial miner anonymity.

    • Both blocks contain only one transaction each, emphasizing an early network state with low activity typical of Bitcoin's genesis era.

    • The size of block 1 is notably smaller (215 bytes compared to 285 bytes), which may reflect minimal transaction metadata and additional empty space typically present in early blocks.

    • Notably, both blocks feature a coinbase value of 5,000,000,000 satoshis, consistent with the initial block reward, maintaining historical significance as the first two entries in the Bitcoin blockchain.

    5 months ago
  • Block: 0
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe
    • The block at height 1 shows an anomaly with no miner identified, contrasting sharply with the previous block that featured a notable miner reference tied to a historical statement. This may indicate a change in mining pools or initial miner anonymity.

    • Both blocks contain only one transaction each, emphasizing an early network state with low activity typical of Bitcoin's genesis era.

    • The size of block 1 is notably smaller (215 bytes compared to 285 bytes), which may reflect minimal transaction metadata and additional empty space typically present in early blocks.

    • Notably, both blocks feature a coinbase value of 5,000,000,000 satoshis, consistent with the initial block reward, maintaining historical significance as the first two entries in the Bitcoin blockchain.

    5 months ago
  • Block: 685467
    Which pool mined this block?
    Scribe

    The current block, which is Block Height 685468, was mined by AntPool. If you have any more questions about Bitcoin or other blocks, feel free to ask!

    5 months ago
  • Block: 685467
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe

    Insights from Block 685467

    • Transaction Volume and Fees: The block includes 1,407 transactions with a significant total fee income, particularly the highest fee transaction at 161,000 sats. This reflects ongoing high network activity and demand for block space.

    • Miner Trends: This block was mined by Poolin, noteworthy as it's their first instance in the immediate sequence after Binance Pool. Such shifts indicate potential strategic moves among mining pools, possibly influenced by network conditions or profitability.

    • Size and Weight Metrics: The block's size is 1,334,471 bytes with a weight of 3,999,644 vBytes, which is substantial but maintains the expected range. The size increase relative to adjacent blocks may indicate a trend toward larger transaction inclusion.

    • OP_RETURN Usage: The presence of OP_RETURN transactions (5) suggests an ongoing trend of embedding data in blocks, facilitating applications beyond financial transactions. This persistence emphasizes Bitcoin's evolving utility.

    This block does not exhibit historical significance but fits within noticeable trends in transaction counts, fee dynamics, and miner activity.

    5 months ago