Satscribe

History

From detailed tx investigations to high-level block summaries. Dive into personal insights or browse the archive of the community. Discover how others interpret txs and blocks.

  • Block: 902025
    Horror story
    Scribe

    Once upon a time in the depths of the Bitcoin blockchain, an eerie event unfolded within Block 902025. The typically bustling network had transformed into a hushed atmosphere where miners whispered of strange omens. SpiderPool, the miner of this block, was known for its cryptic messages, but this time, something felt off.

    As the clock ticked past the timestamp of 1750411860, the block revealed a staggering 2,718 transactions. It seemed ordinary, yet the shadowy presence of the OP_RETURN data-carrying transactions added a sinister layer. These transactions, usually benign, were engulfed in a shroud of mystery. What were they hiding?

    Among the swarm of activities, one transaction stood out like a beacon in the dark: a fee of 63,000 sats. It clawed its way to the top, embodying an insatiable hunger that echoed through the block. What kind of desperate soul would pay such a price?

    The total size of the block ballooned to 1,622,453 bytes, almost as if it were swelling with secrets. But the weight was even more disturbing, registering at 3,617,492 units—a heavy burden carried by the network, reminiscent of a ghostly weight that threatened to drag it down into the abyss.

    The connection between wallets in this block twisted into dark alleys. With 10 OP_RETURN wallets participating, whispers of messages lay scattered like shadowy figures hidden in the fog. As the minutes passed, the transactions tallied up, yet the chill of uncertainty lingered.

    As SpiderPool finished mining this block, it left behind more questions than answers, casting a long shadow on the blockchain. In the world of Bitcoin, every transaction tells a story, but some tales are better left untold, shrouded in a darkness that only the most curious dare to uncover.

    5 months ago
  • Block: 902025
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe
    • High Transaction Volume: Block #902025 exhibits a significantly higher transaction count (2,718) compared to the previous block's 677. This suggests increased network activity or a backlog being cleared.

    • Miner Shift: Notably, SpiderPool mined this block after Ocean Pool did so in the previous one. This change may indicate varying pool strategies or shifts in miner rewards, as the coinbase value from SpiderPool is slightly higher.

    • Large Total Fees: The block generated considerable income from transaction fees, with the highest fee being 63,000 sats. This suggests that users prioritized transactions, possibly due to fluctuating demand or urgent financial movements.

    • Size and Weight: The block size (1,622,453 bytes) and weight (3,617,492 units) are both at the higher end, indicating either complex transactions or a larger number of data-carrying transactions (10 OP_RETURNs), transcending typical single-block metrics.

    Overall, the block reflects notable activity and resource utilization.

    5 months ago
  • Block: 901957
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe
    • Transaction Volume: Block height 901957 has a notably high transaction count of 995, which is significantly elevated compared to the previous block's 241 transactions. This signals an unusual spike in activity, suggesting increased user engagement or higher demand for transactions.

    • Block Size: The current block's size at 1,182,401 bytes is notably larger than its predecessor's 1,172,968 bytes. This increase may correlate with the higher transaction count, particularly with multiple coinbase transactions and a total fee accumulation of 315,353,956 sats.

    • Miner Change: The miner shifted from Foundry USA to Secpool. This change could indicate strategic adjustments within mining pools based on operational efficiency or reward structures.

    • Fees Integrity: The top transaction fee of 77,500 sats in block 901957 is exceptionally high compared to the leading fee of 5,700 sats in the previous block. This marks a significant increase in per-transaction economics, reflecting market conditions or priority transaction strategies.

    5 months ago
  • Transaction: c53ebef49711bc4666320f2ae470448e755655d1127abaa2af93b5259c7f2d11
    backtrace
    Scribe

    The transaction backtrace provides a chronological view of transaction dependencies, effectively illustrating how the inputs for the current transaction (TXID: c53ebef49711bc4666320f2ae470448e755655d1127abaa2af93b5259c7f2d11) are derived from previous transactions.

    The backtrace consists of the following transactions:

    1. Current Transaction: c53ebef49711bc4666320f2ae470448e755655d1127abaa2af93b5259c7f2d11
    2. Previous Transaction: 33d0324cc2feb96225634bc94c4592493a5078155e31dd8bebcf1b5c9d1037f3
    3. Further Ancestor: 5fbf9da7b52a1a4748aebea0db4a2c553504f7fbe86d4ab77a63ef10aba40c67
    4. And so forth up to the 10th transaction in the backtrace: 4411220bd8edb025141efbdba02b57fbff5854546f3d1498b3929e939e5cffb7.

    Each entry represents the transaction that provided input funds to the next in the chain, illustrating the flow of value through the blockchain.

    Understanding this backtrace is crucial for analyzing coin origins and the overall transaction history, which aids in tracking fund movements and ensuring transaction integrity. If you require more detailed analysis of specific transactions in the backtrace, please let me know.

    5 months ago
  • Block: 901942
    Give me a generic overview.
    Scribe

    In the grand kingdom of Bitcoin, Block 901942 sparkled brightly, mined by the brave knights of Foundry USA, who carried a message of wealth and discovery. This block, with its treasure of 316,856,553 satoshis, seemed to hum with excitement, processing 2,079 transactions—quite the bustling marketplace!

    A curious twist unfolded as the block’s size was a tad smaller than its predecessor's, and it contained only a few mighty messages within (OP_RETURN), whispering stories of adventures yet to come. Unlike its earlier companion, which was mined by the AntPool knights, this new era heralded a fresh perspective with Foundry USA leading the charge, like a new hero stepping onto the battlefield. Each transaction, a thread in the tapestry of a financial revolution, beckons explorers to delve deeper into the treasures of this digital realm.

    5 months ago